I wanted to thank all of you for caring, and taking time the out of your busy lives to read my weekly E-column. It is amazing to realize that my E-column has now grown to over 160,000 recipients world-wide. It is nice to know that there is still "Intelligence" on planet earth.

The Internet has changed all of our lives and will continue doing so. Tyranny has always been about information control. Hopefully, by sending my columns to your friends and family, we can build my E-column list to over 1,000,000 people globally and educate enough "Sovereign Human Beings" on how to assert their inherent rights to effect non-violent resolution of our many rights issues with the Ruling Elites of our respective nations.

PLEASE feel free to forward your comments and / or questions to me - trueman@tucksprofessionalservices.com, and / or visit my personal website at www.truemantuck.ca for past ViewPoints and other information about my battles for our rights.

It is interesting how consistent "Black Letter Rule of Law" has been over the centuries - one of the following quotes is from 1608 and the other from 1998.

Can you tell which one is older? Both quotes are from senior judges of their time.

[1] "We are but of yesterday... and our days upon the earth are but as a shadow in respect of the old ancient days and times past, wherein the laws have been by the wisdom of the most excellent men, in many successions of ages, by long and continual experience, [trial of light and truth] fined and refined, which no man, in any age could ever have effected or attained unto."

And,

[2] "Our written Constitution is primarily a written one, the product of 131 years of evolution. Behind the written word is an historic lineage stretching back through the ages, which aids in the consideration of the underlying constitutional principles. These principles inform and sustain the constitutional text: they are the vital un-stated assumptions upon which the text is based".

Please see this document for source and credits.

As indicated in my last week's ViewPoint, in order to assert our inherent "Black Letter Rule of Law" rights in Canada, you must understand that under De Jure Black Letter Rule of Law there are only two Sovereigns in Canada - you, as a human being, and the British Monarch acting via our Governor General. Clarification of "De Facto", Letters Patent, 1947, British North America Act, 1867, Articles of Capitulation, 1760, Constitution Acts 1760 to present

As indicated before, our "Creator" has created the miracle of life and light - "Human Beings".

Remember, under Universal Principles - no "Human Being" should claim to be equal or greater than their "Creator". The same is true for "Artificial Persons". "Human Beings" created "Artificial Persons" and NO "Artificial Person" should claim to be equal or greater than its "Creator"!

I cannot emphasis enough, how important it is, to not only hear this simple truth, but also to learn to understand and apply it as well.

I will give you some practical applications for these two concepts - one being the "Black Letter Rule of Law", and the other being our inherent rights as "Sovereign Human Beings".

Please note, it is not wise to refer to yourself as a "Natural Person", a "Person", or an "Individual", because these are all legal word traps.

You are, in ancient British terms, a Freeman, or in modern terms, a Human Being. Collectively, we are People, Freemen, or Human Beings.

I have always, for my personal situations, when there is a conflict with governments and mega corporations, (both "Artificial Persons") and THEIR bureaucrats, stood and fought to challenge THEIR scheme, whatever it is.

One personal example was over 40 years ago, just east of Ottawa, where I was born. Like many teen-agers, with their own car and a sports car at that, I got a ticket for speeding. I have always had a policy, whenever I get a ticket, I appeal it, and more often then not, go to Court to defend myself, and/or to create the opportunity to negotiate a compromise. I do the same thing with property taxes, parking tickets, income tax, etc.

My theory is that THEY are trying to illegally cheat me and that if I give in easily, then THEY win, and steal my money without any significant opposition. If I fight passionately using THEIR Rule of Law, then win or lose, I have the personal satisfaction of knowing that it has cost THEM far more in resources than me.

The bonus is, that I also learn how to improve my challenge next time.

In my first appearance in Court over my teenage speeding ticket, I passionately made my case, but I was convicted. The judge suspended the sentence. At that time, I did not know what that meant, and I remember asking the Crown Prosecutor and he very rudely said "You are a very lucky young fellow; you talked your way out of the fine this time".

Today, ironically I make a decent living via Tuck’s Professional Services [see www.tucksprofessionalservices.com]. It is a perfect vocation for me, I am being paid to stand up and challenge "Artificial Persons’" authority and actions as a non-lawyer legal practitioner. I have got so good at it, that our firm now contracts with 3 or 4 different law firms to assist our firm in our major case management, and we have learned that very few lawyers really understand and or will truly champion the Sovereign Rights of Human Beings.

The lawyer’s attempt at monopoly on the practice of law is just as deadly to the health and well being of the Canadian People, as the allopathic doctor’s attempt at monopoly on the practice of medicine!

So that each of you can begin to learn to apply the concept of your personal sovereignty, I will give you an example of one of a number of historic cases that our firm managed and/or co-managed: Strauss Herb Company.

The reason I bring this up today, is to explain to you, as a "Sovereign Human Being", how you can defend your rights successfully, against even the most powerful "Artificial Persons" such as the criminal investigate federal police officers working for Health Canada.

Regardless on whether it is a $5.00 parking ticket, or a $1,000,000 tax problem, the "Tuck’s 14 Step Challenge" approach, if applied properly, will almost always give you satisfaction, one way or another.

The first thing you must understand is the concept behind the "Tuck’s 14 Step Challenge Protocol".

It is based upon the assumption that the conflict is with an "Artificial Person", such as a government or mega corporations like banks. It is also based upon the assumption, proven hundreds of times, that the "Artificial Person" is unlikely to be very competent at anything it does - it is like the dinosaur: very large, but only has a pea-size brain.

The checklist of the "Tuck's 14 Step Challenge Protocol" is as follows:

• What is the specific legal nature of the opponent in this conflict?
• How was IT [the Artificial Person] created - when, where, by whom, and for what purpose?
• What were its original obligations, duties, purposes, authority and how have they evolved in time?
• What is the local bureaucrat’s behavior and conduct prompted by?
• What is the local office’s practice for this matter?
• How does what I am experiencing match how THEY deal locally with others on these same issues?
• What are THEIR regional published policies and procedures on these issues?
• What is the provincial, federal, or international official policies and procedures [whatever is applicable depending on what legal entity you are dealing with]?
• What are the actual regulations, how did they come to be, and why?
• What is the specific legislative authority for the regulations and/or offense, or conflict - e.g. taxation?
• What is the jurisdictional authority for the legislation and is it valid and consistent with the original meaning and intent in the language at the time that it was first created?
• In regards to both written and unwritten Black Letter Rule Law, will it stand up to a rights challenge?
• What has been going on in Courts in regards to all of these questions?

The Strauss matter was an ideal example of the power of the Tuck’s 14 Step Challenge Protocol.

The federal crown of Canada is an "Artificial Person" created by a series of United Kingdom regular Statutes: Articles of Capitulation, 1760. Today the De Facto "KING OF CANADA" is the Prime Minister. Legally, Canada is still a united colony of the British Monarch and our country is a "CONFEDERATED NATION" similar to the United States and Switzerland, but with the serious limitation that the "Sovereign People" of Canada have never been formally consulted or involved in creating any "Black Letter Rule of Law" written constitution.

It is important to note, that in Canada, all "Sovereign Authority" of the Crown has been hijacked by the Prime Minister and his staff illegally.

This means that the criminal investigative police officers, who in January 2003, laid 73 criminal charges against not only the Strauss Herb Company, but also the two Master Herbalists - Jim Strauss senior [over 80 years of age] and his son Peter could only possess authority from the original British North America Act, 1867, Constitution Acts 1760 to present, and the original Adulteration and Fraud Act, 1884 and as amended to date, that is delegated in a clearly documented path of authority from the British Monarch.

Sections 91 and 92 of the British North America Act, 1867 deals very specifically with the issues of jurisdiction. Contrary to the De Facto Kings of Canada [the Prime Ministers] 50 year old agenda, key areas of jurisdiction such as civil and property rights, direct taxation for Provincial purposes, trade and commerce other than national standardization of regulations, food, health, and all other matters of a local nature to the Provinces are exclusively Provincial jurisdiction.

There is no Rule of Law provision, in the British Legislation that created Canada, for any entity called "The Cabinet" or "Prime Minister" to have any sovereign power! They are advisors to the Crown in Canada.

The Prime Ministers, starting post war, seized power and have controlled almost everything Federally and Provincially ever since. There is also no basis in "Black Letter Rule of Law" for the massive polarization of power in a federal government.

Prior to the 2nd World War, the Provinces would fight effectively for their "Sovereign Rights" as guarantied by the British North America Act and previous British Legislation and Proclamations.

The following links will give you a flavour of where the lines of jurisdiction are drawn under "Black Letter Rule of Law" and how the challenges helped get rid of the 73 criminal charges in the Strauss case and set the battle ground for our grassroots' driven federal Bill C-420 campaign to amend the federal legislation.

Since the second World War, the Prime Minister and their "Shadow Rulers" or "Elites" and their gangs have seized absolute power in Canada. See new "Gomery" article for details confirming these points of view.

To make a very long story short, federal officials in several federal agencies, including GST, Corporate Income Tax, as well as Health Canada, in a premeditated and unlawful manner, conspired to not only charge the company, but also to create fear to forced compliance as well.

It is also my belief that the federal bureaucrats acted in a deliberate and orchestrated manner to destroy the Strauss Herb Company and force it out of business. The British Columbia allopathic medical investment interests, also in my opinion, via a special project called "Project 2000" have been doing everything possible to ensure that Canadians in British Columbia and elsewhere cannot access traditional, safe and effective, non-toxic, food-based medicines such as herbs, vitamins and minerals.

For over 250 consecutive years the Strauss family have been preventing, treating and even, in some cases, curing, most chronic diseases such as heart disease and cancer using plant based herbal medicines. Be sure to visit the Strauss Herb Company website. They ship globally.

Ironically, the attempt by the Allopathic medical doctors to prevent Herbalist from practicing medicine goes back over 300 years and was dealt with by Henry the 8th in the 3rd year of his rule by a The Royal Proclamation, October 7, 1763 that is still law, not only in Canada, but also in the original 13 colonies of the United States of America and some of the other states such as Nevada.

In my opinion, Strauss Herb Company and its family members were targeted, because it would be "lethal" for the allopathic investment industry [Modern, synthetic toxic chemical medicines] not to have sick people taking drugs, being cut up or radiated.

The type of regulatory unlawful attack that happened to the Strauss family is standard operating practice for Health Canada. THEY target small and medium family owned enterprises. Currently there is a massive Health Freedom trial going on in Canada with Truehope Nutrition in Calgary on similar issues. See History of Truehope Nutrition.

The Strauss Herb Company and Jim and Peter Strauss, as a result of the efforts of Shawn Buckley and Tuck’s Professional Services, were able to get rid of all 73 charges [see link. Jim Strauss is now actively pursuing a very successful civil suit.

The other reason that the Strauss family was so viciously targeted was because they did not live in fear of the government, like so many do. They stood up to the allopathic medical establishment and other regulatory bodies for decades to defend their rights to continue practicing herbal medicine without a license from any Provincial or federal bureaucrat as they have done for over 250 consecutive years.

Bless his heart - Jim Strauss senior has already maintained that as a Master Herbalist, his license to practice medicine comes from his "Creator".

Unfortunately, a large percentage of People have either a fear of governments and/or an inherent "Ostrich Response", when placed in a conflict situation with government bureaucrats. The failure of anyone to stand up to abusive bureaucratic nonsense hurts all of us, by letting the problem of the bureaucratic bully continue.

Today in Canada, all levels of government are generally out of control; however there is hope. In well over 100 conflict test cases, where "Tuck’s 14 Step Challenge Protocol" was properly used, our success rate was over 80% in one fashion or another.

Every single, so-called "PUBLIC SERVANT" needs, under "Black Letter Rule of Law", strict specific legislative authority for anything THEY DO.

Every "Artificial Person" that any "PUBLIC SERVANT" works for has specific duties and obligations under both the entire legislative history that created IT and the written and unwritten Black Letter Rule of Law LIVE( "Magna Carta" of June 15th 1215, and as updated 1216, 1217, 1225, 1253, 1297, Petition of Right, 1628, Habeas Corpus Act, 1679, English Bill of Rights, 1689, the Act of Settlement, 1701, and these Constitution Acts 1760 to present) as well as under their "Oaths" of office.

Remember, when the People fear the government, Sovereignty is vested in the Ruler or Rulers who control the government and you have tyranny.

If the government fear the People, the Sovereignty vests in the People and you have as close to real Rule by the People, for the People, as is practicable in any confederated, Rule of Law, democratic society.

It is important that the next time you, personally, have some bureaucrat telling you what you must do, that you try applying the "Tuck’s 14 Step challenge Protocol".

Remember, it must be done non-violently, with respect and courtesy and in writing. Everything must be politely and professionally documented. You need to always remember that you are creating a case that could end up in front of a Jury and / or a Judge and you want to look fair and reasonable.

Always ask for a copy of the specific legislative authority that the bureaucrat is relying on to act against your Sovereign Interests, and ensure that you force them to be on record in writing and or by using digital recording equipment.

If the area of conflict is something like your property or income taxes, you need to either

Reproduction and distribution is authorized without prior written consent on condition a tear sheet with full identification of the republisher is provided by email: info@matrixverite.com or by fax: 613-968-3215. For more information contact Matrix Verite at (613) 968-2613.

This email is sent to our subscriber list, which is now over 160,000 truth seekers and growing daily. This list has been developed over 10 years. This communication is not intended for commercial purposes and is provided for information and educational purposes in order to assist interested human beings in understanding their inalienable and inherent freedoms, liberties, and rights, especially property rights.

Should a friend have sent this to you and you wish to be on our list, please email us at info@matrixverite.com. If you do not wish to be on our list any more, please email us at info@matrixverite.com and request removal or call (613) 968-2613.

Reproduction and distribution is authorized without prior written consent on condition a tear sheet with full identification of the republisher is provided by email: info@matrixverite.com or by fax: 613-968-3215. For more information contact Matrix Verite at (613) 968-2613.

This email is sent to our subscriber list, which is now over 152,000 truth seekers and growing daily. This list has been developed over 10 years. This communication is not intended for commercial purposes and is provided for information and educational purposes in order to assist interested human beings in understanding their inalienable and inherent freedoms, liberties, and rights, especially property rights.

Should a friend have sent this to you and you wish to be on our list, please email us at info@matrixverite.com. If you do not wish to be on our list any more, please email us at info@matrixverite.com and request removal or call (613) 968-2613.